top of page

Discussion Summary: Setting up an OM System: Q&A

Content type:

OM Discussion summary

Author(s):

Kaia Ambrose

Theme:

OM Resources: Other Community Information

Language:

English

Published:

3 May 2018

This discussion summary presents community feedback regarding three questions related to challenges in data collection and analysis during OM implementation in programs. The questions posed were: 1) Is it possible to do outcome mapping where the observer and the documenter are different people? 2) What would be the typical frequency for data collection for a project using outcome mapping? Is it an episodic process (i.e., document significant change whenever you see it), or can it be periodic, e.g. collect data once or twice a year?
and 3) How often do most OM projects do such reflection workshops?

This discussion summary presents community feedback regarding three questions related to challenges in data collection and analysis during OM implementation in programs. The questions posed were: 1) Is it possible to do outcome mapping where the observer and the documenter are different people? 2) What would be the typical frequency for data collection for a project using outcome mapping? Is it an episodic process (i.e., document significant change whenever you see it), or can it be periodic, e.g. collect data once or twice a year?
and 3) How often do most OM projects do such reflection workshops?

Discussion Summary: Setting up an OM System: Q&A

Related resources

Outcome Mapping Learning Community

We're a not-for-profit organisation registered in Belgium.

Email: info@outcomemapping.org

Registration no: 0541857935

© 2024 by Outcome Mapping Learning Community. Powered and secured by Wix |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy

bottom of page