top of page

Discussion summary: OM is good but donors still require LFs?

Content type:

OM Discussion summary

Author(s):

Hugo Soliz

Theme:

OM Resources: Other

Language:

English

Published:

20 January 2009

Outlined in this document is a summary of the discussion from the Outcome Mapping Forum focused on the Opening Question:

“we are reviewing our program management model and are moving towards Outcome mapping, however my concern is while outcome is interesting, innovative etc...i think all big donors will still require logframe based systems ... so small organization like ours will then have two systems and managers are left a burden to comply with both...

any comment?

Discussion summary: OM is good but donors still require LFs?

Outcome Mapping Learning Community

We're a not-for-profit organisation registered in Belgium.

Email: info@outcomemapping.org

Registration no: 0541857935

© 2024 by Outcome Mapping Learning Community. Powered and secured by Wix |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy

bottom of page